‘You Have Judged It Opportune to Adjust the Dioceses Division according to the New Civil Division ...’ The Report of Bishop of Omsk Arcadius to Metropolitan of Nizhny Novgorod Sergius and the Holy Synod in 1929

Print PDF

УДК 94(470)+271.21

DOI 10.28995/2073-0101-2018-2-387-405

Alexey V. Sushko

Omsk State Technical University, Omsk Tank-Automotive Engineering Institute, Omsk, Russian Federation

Dmitrii I. Petin

Omsk State Technical University, Historical Archive of the Omsk Region, Omsk, Russian Federation

‘You Have Judged It Opportune to Adjust the Dioceses Division according to the New Civil Division ...’ The Report of Bishop of Omsk Arcadius to Metropolitan of Nizhny Novgorod Sergius and the Holy Synod in 1929

Abstract

The article offers a source study of the report of bishop of Omsk Arkady to Metropolitan of Nizhny Novgorod Sergius and the Holy Synod made in 1929. The text analysis allows to address the problem of relationship between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Soviet authorities. The report, which is published here, allows to follow the sequence of territorial redistribution of the Omsk diocese in 1920s. The problem of its authorship is considered. Having studied a copy of the report in the archival investigative file stored in the archive of the Federal Security Service of Russia Directorate for the Omsk Region, the author establishes that the document was prepared by Archpriest V.F. Infatiev, leader of the Omsk Tikhonovtsy and rector of the Fraternal Church in Omsk. Biographical and historical–genetic methods have been of most use in the research. Biographical method allows to study the document in connection with life and activities of its authors. The historical genetic method, based on materials of the Omsk diocese, shows how the Soviet state used the administrative redistribution of dioceses to obstruct church administration. It sought to fragment and weaken large dioceses that were fighting new church schism. The article reveals the specifics of administrative and territorial reorganization in the Omsk diocese, which boundaries kept changing for a variety of reasons. First, the Soviet power had not forgotten that Omsk of the capital of White Russia, and Novonikolaevsk (Novosibirsk) was made capital of Soviet Siberia. Reconstruction of diocesan borders in accordance with new Soviet administrative–territorial division disrupted traditional church administration. Some cities still gravitated towards Omsk, but over time they were separated from the Omsk diocese. Secondly, the Bolsheviks provoked and supported the inter-church struggle for power, in which many church leaders were then actively involved. This resulted in separation of a number of territories from the Omsk diocese. Thirdly, while the Kyrgyz (Kazakh) republic was being formed and developed, some of its large cities were subordinate to Omsk. The work may be of interest to researchers studying Russian society in the pre–war period, history of the Russian Orthodox Church, and activities of the Soviet Special Services concerning religious institutions.

Download the article: sushko_petin_doi

Keywords

Sources, Omsk, Russian Orthodox Church, religious policy, repression, special services.

References

BARDILEVA, YU. P. “Predat' sudu vsekh lits, ulichennykh v izdevatel'skikh vykhodkakh po otnosheniyu k veruyushchim…”: narusheniya sovetskogo “religioznogo” zakonodatel'stva regional'nymi vlastyami pri zakrytii tserkvei na territorii Evropeiskogo Severa Rossii v kontse 1920–kh – 1930–e gg. [‘To commit to trial everyone caught out taunting believers ...’: Violations of Soviet ‘religious’ legislation commited by regional authorities when closing churches in the European North of Russia in late 1920s - 1930s. In Russ.]. IN: Noveishaya istoriya Rossii – Modern history of Russia, 2011, no. 1, pp. 216–227.

VASILEVSKY, V. P, SUSHKO, A. V. “Strazhi revolyutsii”: organy GPU–OGPU v Omskom Priirtysh'ye [‘Sentinels of the Revolution’: Organs of the GPU–OGPU in the Omsk region. In Russ.]. Omsk, Omskii gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskii universitet publ., 2017, 280 р.

DAMASKIN, Hegumen (ORLOVSKY, V. A.) Sudebno–sledstvennoe delo ieromonakha Makariya (Telegina) kak istochnik personal'noi informatsii. 1922 g. [Judicial and investigatory case of celibate priest Makariy (Telegin) as source of personal information: 1922. In Russ.]. IN: Vestnik arhivista – Herald of an Archivist, 2012, no. 4, pp. 231–240.

KOZLOV, F. N. “Verno, est' za mnoi odin malen'kii greshok: ya s 1913 goda po 1917 god byl sluzhitelem kul'ta” [‘Correct, I Do Have One Small Sin: From 1913 to 1917 I Was a Minister of Religion.’ In Russ.]. IN: Vestnik arhivista – Herald of an Archivist, 2016, no. 2, pp. 230–248.

ODINTSOV, M. I. Patriarkh Sergii [Patriarch Sergius]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya publ., 2013, 396 р.

RYBAKOV, R. V. “Usilit' vliyanie militaristov na mestakh”: iz dokumentov Irkutskogo gubernskogo otdela OGPU o metodakh bor'by s religioznymi organizatsiyami v pervoi polovine 1920–kh gg. [‘Strengthen the militarist influence on the ground’: Documents of the Irkutsk provincial department of the OGPU on methods of fighting religious organizations in the first half of 1920s. In Russ.]. IN: Omskii nauchnyi vestnik. Seriya: Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost' [Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series: Society. History. Modernity], 2017, no. 3, pp. 30–37.

SUSHKO, A. V. Sluzhenie i podvig svyashchennika Vasiliya Feofanovicha Infat'eva [Ministration and act of faith of priest Vasily Feofanovich Infatiev. In Russ.]. IN: Vestnik Omskoi Pravoslavnoi Dukhovnoi Seminarii [Bulletin of the Omsk Orthodox Spiritual Seminary], 2016, no. 1, pp. 129–134.

SUSHKO, A. V. Uchastie omskogo dukhovenstva v sobytiyakh Russkoi revolyutsii i Grazhdanskoi voiny (Na primere sudeb arkhiepiskopa Sil'vestra (Ol'shevskogo) i svyashchennika V. F. Infant'eva) [The participation of the Omsk clergy in the events of the Russian Revolution and the Civil War (On the example of the fate of Archbishop Sylvester (Olshevsky) and priest VF Infantiev). In Russ.]. IN: Omskii nauchnyi vestnik. Seriya: Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost' [Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series: Society. History. Modernity], 2017, no. 3, pp. 5–8.

FREESE, G. “Vsya vlast' prikhodam”: vozrozhdeniye pravoslaviya v 1920–ye gg. [‘All power to the parishes’: The revival of Orthodoxy in 1920s. In Russ.]. IN: Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, religion, church in Russia and abroad], 2012, no. 3–4 (30), pp. 87–88.

About authors

Sushko Alexey Vladimirovich, PhD in History, associate professor, Omsk State Technical University, national history department, head of the department; Omsk Tank-Automotive Engineering Institute, department of humanitarian and social and economic disciplines, professor, Omsk, Russian Federation, +7-962–057–13–27, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Petin Dmitrii Igorevich, PhD in History, associate professor, Omsk State Technical University, national history department, assistant professor; Historical Archive of the Omsk Region, Centre for Studying the Civil War History, chief archivist, +7(3812)370–558, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Grant information

This article has been prepared with financial support from of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and from the Government of the Omsk region (science project no. 17–11–55001)

Submitted 4.11.2017, published:

SUSHKO, A. V., PETIN, D. I. “Vy pochli svoevremennym prisposobit' delenie eparkhii primenitel'no k novomu grazhdanskomu deleniyu…”. Doklad episkopa Omskogo Arkadiya mitropolitu Nizhegorodskomu Sergiyu i Svyashchennomu Sinodu. 1929 g. [‘You Have Judged It Opportune to Adjust the Dioceses Division according to the New Civil Division ...’: The Report of Bishop of Omsk Arcadius to Metropolitan of Nizhny Novgorod Sergius and the Holy Synod in 1929. In Russ.]. IN: Vestnik arhivista / Herald of an Archivist, 2018, no. 2, pp. 387-405. doi 10.28995/2073-0101-2018-2-387-405

You can read completely article in the russian historic-archival magazine “The Herald of an Archivist”. Read more about terms of subscription here.

Полностью материал публикуется в российском историко-архивоведческом журнале ВЕСТНИК АРХИВИСТА. Ознакомьтесь с условиями подписки здесь.