Defense of a doctoral dissertation on history during the Great Patriotic War: the experience of Ivan Matveyevich Kataev

Scientific article

doi 10.28995/2073-0101-2024-4-1083-1100

For citation

Grishina, Natalya V. (2024). Defense of a doctoral dissertation on history during the Great Patriotic War, the experience of Ivan Matveyevich Kataev, Herald of an Archivist, no. 4, pp. 1083-1100, doi 10.28995/2073-0101-2024-4-1083-1100

Grishina, Natalya V., Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Defense of a doctoral dissertation on history during the Great Patriotic War: the experience of Ivan Matveyevich Kataev

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of organizing and conducting thesis defenses by Soviet historians in wartime conditions. It considers the defense of a doctoral dissertation by the historian Ivan Matveevich Kataev, which took place at the Institute of History of the USSR Academy of Sciences (IHAS) in June 1944. The case of I. M. Kataev's defense allowed us to address important aspects of the topic of the dissertation culture of Soviet historians. I. M. Kataev is presented in the system of communications of the scientific community of the late 1930s - mid-1940s, where the fates and views on the development of historical science of scientists of different generations intersected. The organizational framework of I. M. Kataev's debate gives an idea of the practice of thesis defenses at the Institute of History of the USSR Academy of Sciences, including the formal procedure and traditions of thesis discussion. I. M. Kataev's disputation, placed in the context of the total number of historians' defenses, made it possible to reveal the dynamics and peculiarities of dissertation defenses at the Institute of History of the USSR Academy of Sciences during the Great Patriotic War. The defense of I. M. Kataev's dissertation is presented against the background of a wide range of factors that influenced the development of wartime historical science (evacuation and re-evacuation of the Institute of History, criticism of M. N. Pokrovsky's ideas, etc.). I. M. Kataeva's discussion raises the issue of the dissertations of “provincial” scientists, whose acquisition of academic degrees, especially doctoral degrees, was an important aspect of the personnel policy of regional universities. The source basis of the study was the transcript of the defense, deposited in the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ARAN), as well as a set of office documents accompanying the defense and included in the dissertation file of the applicant, found in the collection of the Higher Attestation Commission in the State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF). In addition to the documents mentioned above, the sources of regional and local archives - the United State Archive of the Chelyabinsk Region (OGACHO) and the City Archive of Magnitogorsk - were involved. The documents used significantly supplemented the known facts of I. M. Kataev's biography, as well as allowed to reveal the system of interaction between the institutions of the center and the province involved in the awarding of academic degrees. The study draws conclusions about the incompleteness of the formation of the Soviet dissertation culture in the early 1940s. The organization of the disputation stretched for 4 years, which was due to both the influence of external factors related to wartime and the manifestation of intrascientific conventions, within which the defense of a dissertation by a researcher from the province did not fit into the current directions of scientific policy and its defense was postponed.

Keywords

Ivan Matveyevich Kataev, doctoral dissertation, source study, Soviet dissertation culture, opponents, Great Patriotic War, wartime disputations.

Download the article: grishina_doi

References

Alevras, N. N. (2023). Defense of dissertations by Nikolai Ilyich Pokrovsky at the Leningrad University, Vestnik of St. Petersburg University, Series History, Т. 68, v. 1, pp. 259-276.

Basargina, E. Yu. (2021). To the 130th anniversary of M. E. Sergeenko, defense of doctoral dissertation in besieged Leningrad, Philologia Classica, № 16 (2), pp. 346-369.

Burdey, G. D., Borodkin, L. I. (1993). Defense of dissertations on civil history in 1941-1945 (Sources, problematics, dynamics), Auxiliary Historical Disciplines, v. XXIV, St. Petersburg, pp. 106-126.

Demidova, L. D., Kirillov, A. K. (2018). The History of One Defense, Candidate's Dissertation of Ya. S. Lurie as a stage of formation of the historian, Historical Courier, № 1, pp. 54-73.

Karpyuk, S. G. (2020). Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in 1941-1943. Documentary evidence, New and Modern History, Т. 64, № 5, pp. 128-139.

Kataev, I. M. (1948). On the banks of the Volga, Chelyabinsk, Chelyabgiz publ., 106 р.

Kataev, I. M. (1949). Usolskaya fiefdom on the eve of the peasant reform of 1861, Magnitogorsk State Pedagogical Institute, Scientific Notes, v. II, pp. 5-7.

Korzun, V. P., Kolevatov, D. M. (2009). On the first-second calculate: the man of the second plan as a research project, Dialogue with Time, Almanac of Intellectual History, v. 28, pp. 342-357.

Kremer, N. B. (2004). Social relations and the organization of management in the serfdom of the Usolsk fiefdom of Orlovs, Orlovs-Davydovs (1768-1861), Dis. … cand. hist. nauk, Samara, 231 р.

Metel, O. V. (2021). Academic Science in Evacuation, Institute of History of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1941-1943, Bulletin of Tomsk State University, № 472, pp. 139-146.

Oshurkova, R. A. (2001). Kataev Ivan Matveyevich, IN: Professors of Perm State University, Perm, Perm State University publ., pp. 88-89.

Potemkina, M. N., Filatov, V. V. (2019). Higher historical education in Magnitogorsk (1932-2019 years), Humanitarian-pedagogical research, Т. 3, № 1, pp. 34-43.

Terekhov, A. N. (2023). Ivan Matveyevich Kataev, the fate of the historian, Southern Urals, History, historiography, sources. Interuniversity collection of scientific articles, v. 10, pp. 60-73.

Tikhonov, V. V. (2016). Ideological campaigns of “late Stalinism” and Soviet historical science (mid-1940s-1953), Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoria publ., 424 р.

Gascoigne, J. (2019). Science and the State from the Scientific Revolution to Word War II, Cambridge, Cambridge University publ., 250 р.

Kaplan, V. (2013). Weathering the Revolution: Patronage as a Strategy of Survival, Revolutionary Russia, v. 26, № 2, pp. 97–127.

Nasaw, D. (2009). Historians and Biography, The American Historical Review, v. 114, № 3, pp. 573–578.

Richards, J. R. (2017). The Role of Biography in Intellectual History, Know, A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge, v. 1, № 2, pp. 295–318.

Renders, Hans, Binnede Haan, Jonne Harmsma (Ed.). The Biographical Turn, Lives in History, New York, Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group publ., 2017, 222 p.

About authors

Grishina Natalya V., PhD history, Chelyabinsk State University, Faculty of History and Philology, Dean of the Faculty, Chelyabinsk, Russia, +7-904-978-40-10, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Grant information

The article was prepared with the financial support of the Fund for Advanced Scientific Research of Chelyabinsk State University (Order № 126-1 of 14.03.2024).

The article was received in the editorial office on 25.03.2024, recommended for publication on 20.09.2024.